<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogers Computer Rankings: NCAA FBS Rankings, Week Eight, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:44:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brock Rogers (author)</title>
		<link>http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock Rogers (author)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>Well, we don&#039;t advocate placing bets on sports, but that&#039;s not keeping us from developing an extention of the system to evaluate point spreads.  Chances are, it won&#039;t be ready by the end of this year, so don&#039;t hold your breath, but should be in place by next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we don&#8217;t advocate placing bets on sports, but that&#8217;s not keeping us from developing an extention of the system to evaluate point spreads.  Chances are, it won&#8217;t be ready by the end of this year, so don&#8217;t hold your breath, but should be in place by next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another anonymous comment</title>
		<link>http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2527</link>
		<dc:creator>another anonymous comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/#comment-2527</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think they are horrible, I think they are fascinating. where can I put down some money? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they are horrible, I think they are fascinating. where can I put down some money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock Rogers (author)</title>
		<link>http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock Rogers (author)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>You might think they are horrible, but comparing the games of last week to these rankings, the higher ranked team won 81% of the time.  Still think they are horrible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might think they are horrible, but comparing the games of last week to these rankings, the higher ranked team won 81% of the time.  Still think they are horrible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2523</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportales.com/football/rogers-computer-rankings-ncaa-fbs-rankings-week-eight-2007/#comment-2523</guid>
		<description>Horrible rankings they just dont make sense. good writing but horrible rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horrible rankings they just dont make sense. good writing but horrible rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
