Pacman Versus Dinamita

The March 16, 2008 boxing re-match between the Filipino and Mexican boxers, Manny “Pacman” Pacquiao and Juan Manuel “Dinamita” Marquez, has drawn varied speculations from millions of spectators that watched the actual ring fight in Las Vegas, USA, from home television sets to big screens installed in gymnasiums, as well as the listeners that monitored the boxing progress on the radio.

I am not a boxing enthusiast, but being part of the journalism industry I could not help but keep track on the most awaited re-match of the two boxers following a “draw” during their first boxing bout in 2004 that have undeniably been drawing so much appeal and global relevance to sports people from all walks of life. Having watched the sensational event live on television was a worthwhile opportunity in sharing an opinion based on facts shown on the TV screen.

The first 2 rounds of the 12-round match immediately gave Marquez an edge against Pacman who practically retaliated on the third round with a deadly punch his left hand is known of, hitting Marquez’ jaw that sent the Mexican down on his back to the ring floor, albeit hastily gotten up before the bell signaled an end for round 3. By the progress of the fight, the exchange of blows came after the other and I lost count on who gave the best shot, however, evident that the Mexican boxer dominated the fight in terms of number of punches landing directly to his opponent.

The pronouncement of winner was a blow of surprise to Manny Pacquiao soon as “A new champion” reverberated in the air declaring him the winner and the new WBC featherweight champion. Obviously, Pacman himself did not expect the Judges’ decision in his favor, but he won the fight by split decision. Majority of the Filipinos were jubilant for the virtual victory while I was among those surprised by the result that Marquez lost despite his vantage performance.

I may be inept in so far as the technical aspect of judging a boxing match is concerned but on the basis of tangible performance the two boxers displayed; reality bespeaks that the negative views and opinions of some Filipino sports authorities who gave candid evaluation on the result could not be held responsible for airing out upfront comments and skepticism on the judging criteria.

This line of argument would continue dominating the international sports scene until such time that Marquez and the Mexican people doubtful of having been deceived by a biased decision shall have been reasonably placated with an affirmation of another re-match, which Marquez challenged shortly following announcement of Pacman’s victory.

Manny Pacquiao is known for his fair and untainted fight in the field of boxing. The Judges’ decision should not be taken against him coupled by the fact that he also showed much effort but evidently not his best feat. Should another re-match coined in the future, Pacman would best exercise extra caution and more prepared should he wishes to beat Marquez in a manner the spectators shall have but all good words for his performance.

Being part of the winning side of the game gives a sense of cultural accomplishment. However, real victory should bear the crown of efforts and diadem of thoughts.