Baseball’s All-Time Greatest Teams

It isn’t an easy task choosing between them, but statistically these are the four best teams in baseball history. Enjoy this journey through the glorious past of baseball greats.

Comments (16)|91 Liked It

Ask baseball fans who the greatest team of all time is and the most common answer would probably be the 1927 Murders Row New York Yankees of Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig. But was that really the greatest baseball team of all time statistically? Were any other teams as good as or better than the 1927 Yankees? In order to try and answer that question I statistically analyzed all Major League baseball teams from 1901 until today.

What constitutes a great team? Obviously winning is a hallmark of a great team and so is dominating the opposition. So how did I quantify that statistically? I used five markers that teams must meet to be considered great.

  1. Winning Percentage – Great teams should win the vast majority of their games. I used .700 as the cutoff.
  2. Run Differential – The difference between how many runs scored minus how many runs given up per game on average. The higher the number the more dominating a team is. I used 1.80 as the cutoff.
  3. Total Number of Great Players – Great players being defined as Hall of Fame players or Hall of Fame caliber players. Hall of Fame caliber players are players who fall short of the Hall of Fame but had Hall of Fame caliber seasons and failed to make it due mainly to longevity issues. I used a combination of at least 6 players who are Hall of Fame players or Hall of Fame caliber players as the cutoff.
  4. Led League in Both Runs Scored and Fewest Runs Allowed – Teams should do both to be considered great and dominating. Some might argue that park effects play a great role in determining which teams lead the league in runs scored and runs allowed. That is true but great teams overcome all obstacles which is what makes them the greatest. (The Brooklyn Dodgers played in a bandbox in Ebbets Field yet led the National League in both categories in the 1955 season, while the Los Angeles Dodgers have played in the greatest pitchers park in baseball since Dodger Stadium was opened and they too led the National League in both categories in 1974 and 1978. None of the Dodger teams qualify on all categories though.)
  5. Winning the World Series (provided there was a World Series) – how can a team be considered great if they did not win the World Series if they played in it? The 1906 Chicago Cubs won 116 games and had a winning percentage of .763, the best ever for regular season since 1901, but lost the World Series to their cross-town rivals the Chicago White Sox.

Only Four Teams Meet All Five Markers (Players Stats For The Year In Parenthesis):

1902 Pittsburgh Pirates – 103-36 (.741), led league in runs scored with 775 while allowing the fewest runs at 440, which works out to 5.58 runs scored per game while allowing 3.17 runs per game for a 2.41 run differential. No World Series played in 1902.

Three Hall of Famers on the team in Honus Wagner (105 runs, 91 RBI’s, 42 SB’s, .330 avg) Fred Clarke (103 runs, 29 SB’s, .401 OBP) and Jack Chesbro (28-6, 2.17 ERA). Three more Hall of Fame caliber players in Jesse Tannehill (20-6, 1.95 ERA), Deacon Phillippe (20-9, 2.05) and Sam Leever (16-7, 2.39).

1927 New York Yankees – 110-44 (.714), led league in runs scored with 975 while allowing the fewest runs at 599, which works out to 6.33 runs scored per game while allowing 3.89 runs per game for a 2.44 run differential. Swept the Pittsburgh Pirates in the World Series.

Six Hall of Fame players on the team in Babe Ruth (158 runs, 60 HR’s, 164 RBI’s, 1.26 OPS), Lou Gehrig (149 runs, 49 HR’s, 175 RBI’s, 1.24 OPS), Tony Lazzeri (92 runs, 18 HR’s, 102 RBI’s, 22 SB’s, .865 OPS), Earle Combs (137 runs, .356 avg, .925 OPS), Waite Hoyt (22-7, 2.63 ERA) and Herb Pennock (19-8, 3.00 ERA). Another player, Urban Shocker (18-6, 2.84 ERA), was Hall of Fame caliber and would be in the Hall of Fame if not for his untimely illness and death in 1928 from heart disease and pneumonia. Bob Meusel (103 RBI’s, 24 SB’s, .337 avg, .903 OPS) was also a Hall of Fame caliber player.

1939 New York Yankees – 106-45 (.702), led league in runs scored with 967 while allowing the fewest runs at 556, which works out to 6.40 runs scored per game while allowing 3.68 runs per game for a 2.72 run differential. Swept the Cincinnati Reds in the World Series.

Five Hall of Fame players on the team but Lou Gehrig does not really count as the Iron Horse’s iron man streak of 2,130 consecutive games played came to an end just 8 games into the season due to Gehrig’s unfortunate illness with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or ALS. Which is also known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease today.

The other four Hall of Famer’s on the team were Joe Dimaggio (108 runs, 30 HR’s, 126 RBI’s, .381 avg, 1.12 OPS), Bill Dickey (98 runs, 24 HR’s, 105 RBI’s, .916 OPS), Red Ruffing (21-7, 2.93 ERA) and Lefty Gomez (12-8, 3.41 ERA). Also on the team were Hall of Fame caliber players Joe Gordon (92 runs, 28 HR’s, 111 RBI’s, .876 OPS), Red Rolfe (139 runs, 80 RBI’s, .329 avg, .899 OPS) and Charlie Keller (87 runs, 83 RBI’s, .334 avg, .947 OPS).

1998 New York Yankees – 114-48 (.704), led league in runs scored with 965 while allowing the fewest runs at 656, which works out to 5.96 runs scored per game while allowing 4.05 runs per game for a run differential of 1.91. Swept the San Diego Padres in the World Series.

Two sure Hall of Famers on the team in Derek Jeter (127 runs, 19 HR’s, 84 RBI’s, 30 SB’s, .324 avg, .865 OPS) and Mariano Rivera (36 Saves, 1.91 ERA). The 1998 New York Yankees had a remarkable number of Hall of Fame caliber players in Jorge Posada (.825 OPS), Tino Martinez (92 runs, 28 HR’s, 123 RBI’s, .860 OPS) Chuck Knoblauch (117 runs, 31 SB’s), Bernie Williams (101 runs, 26 HR’s, 97 RBI’s, .339 avg, .997 OPS), Paul O’Neill (95 runs, 24 HR’s, 116 RBI’s, .317 avg, .882 OPS), Orlando “El Duque” Hernandez (12-4, 3.13), Andy Pettitte (16-11, 4.24 ERA), David Wells (18-4, 3.49 ERA) and David Cone (20-7, 3.55 ERA) all playing regularly (with Darryl Strawberry and Tim “Rock” Raines playing part-time).

How Do They Stack Up?

Winning Percentage:

  1. 1902 Pittsburgh Pirates – .741
  2. 1927 New York Yankees – .714
  3. 1998 New York Yankees – .704
  4. 1939 New York Yankees – .702

Run Differential:

  1. 1939 New York Yankees – 2.72
  2. 1927 New York Yankees – 2.44
  3. 1902 Pittsburgh Pirates – 2.41
  4. 1998 New York Yankees – 1.91

Number of Great Players:

  1. 1998 New York Yankees – 11
  2. 1927 New York Yankees – 8
  3. 1939 New York Yankees – 7
  4. 1902 Pittsburgh Pirates – 6

All four teams led their league in both runs scored and fewest runs allowed.

Except for the 1902 Pirates, the other three Yankee teams all won the World Series by sweeping their opponents. No World Series was played in 1902.

What do we end up with? The four greatest teams in Major League baseball history. Trying to separate them is difficult. What’s interesting to note is that 1902 Pirates had the best winning percentage of the four, the 1939 Yankees had the greatest run differential of the four, and the 1998 Yankees had the greatest number of Hall of Fame caliber players.

The 1927 Murders Row New York Yankees of Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig did not lead in any of the categories but were second in each one.

Tags: , , , ,

16 Comments

  1. Bill
    Posted July 30, 2007 at 5:15 pm

    Great article… I mean no east coast bias at all in there. The 2001 Seattle Mariners only won 116 games after all. The 1906 cubbies (i think that was the year) only won 116 games too. Clearly they sucked

    Also the seattle mariners had two lock future hall of famers (Ichiro and Edgar). Were one of the best defensive teams of all time (set the record twice in subsequent years with about the same team, or at least the same key defensive players).

    Had a catcher who had the best defensive numbers of any catcher in the history of the game (though his offensive numbers will more then be crappy enough to keep him out of the Hall).

    I have an idea. Why don’t we just get rid of any record that doesn’t have to do with the Yankees? Fair enough.

  2. Ken
    Posted July 30, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    Your agruement if mute to me, when it comes to the Seattle team. They didn’t win when it mattered, and part five said, Won World Series…

  3. Paul Allison
    Posted July 30, 2007 at 6:29 pm

    What a shame – your cutoffs discounted what many experts consider the greatest single team of all-time: The 1929 Philadelphia Athletics. Their winning percentage at .693 just misses your mark, and they neglected to lead the league in runs scores (25 behind Detroit). However, their run differential was tops in the league, and their run differential was +1.90. So good was this team that their RA/game was 0.80 better than the team in second place!

    Great players? Jimmie Foxx, Mickey Cochrane, Al Simmons, Jim Cronin, Eddie Collins, Lefty Grove and Connie Mack say hi.

  4. John M
    Posted July 30, 2007 at 8:19 pm

    Calling anyone other than Jeter and Rivera on the ‘98 Yankees a “great” player is a joke, and neither of those two will make the Hall of Fame on the first vote, unless they both have careers into their 40s..

  5. Manzella
    Posted July 30, 2007 at 8:30 pm

    61 Yankees
    98 Yankees

    I’d bet on either of them before any of the others listed here…

  6. soxfan
    Posted July 30, 2007 at 11:23 pm

    @JohnM

    I am NOT a Yankee fan by any stretch. So, I am sincerely unbiased when I say that Mariano Rivera will be a first ballot HoF’er…even if he retired today.

    He has simply been the most dominant relief pitcher of his era. Few others in the game have so completely dominated their position for has long as he has (and yes…he is slipping now in the twilight of his career.) The mystique of playing for those late 90’s Yankee teams only adds to his aura.

  7. bbowman
    Posted July 31, 2007 at 5:50 am

    Are we forgetting the Big Red Machine? 1975 and 1976 – They had a few great players as well, and won two world series in a row.

    Rose
    Bench
    Morgan
    Perez
    Concepcion
    Foster
    Geronimo
    Griffey

    That is an amazing line-up.

  8. gqnxtq
    Posted August 4, 2007 at 5:31 am

    very good cool

  9. Skinny
    Posted August 18, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    Knoblauch, Bernie Williams, Paul O’Neill, Orlando Hernandez, Tino Martinez, David Cone are considered Hall of fame caliber? Posada may get in depending on longevity. Wells and Pettitte are big ifs. Rivera & Jeter are sure things but the rest are not even close. What is considered a hall of fame caliber player?

  10. roger
    Posted October 3, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    what about the oakland teams from the 1970’s that dominated everybody including the Big Red machine and the all great and powerful yankees they were so dominant that had they not been dismantled they would have went on to be the greatest team ever who knows maybe they are before anyone responds look at the stats they dont lie all the world series all the HOF’s and potential HOF’s no one comes even close except maybe the 27 yankees and i am neither an A’s fan nor a yankees fan

  11. larcha
    Posted October 19, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    98 yankees

  12. stratfreak
    Posted December 24, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    27 Yankees, 54 Indians, 31 Athletics, 53 Dodgers. Do more research.

  13. KevinC
    Posted March 5, 2009 at 11:12 am

    The 31 A’s, 53 Dodgers and 54 Indians all LOST in the World Series and the 54 Indians were Swept. hahaha

  14. Posted March 15, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Enticing article which is timeless.

  15. fred forscher
    Posted October 4, 2009 at 5:30 am

    to hold teams to 700 is unfair mabe 650 nand not include teams who were upset in ws and now days its harder to win it all the 06 cubs were one if the top teams of all time so were seattle and 69 baltimore

  16. Posted October 4, 2009 at 7:47 am

    Fred, the teams you mention were Great teams but not the Greatest. If your not the World Champions and were beaten by another team you can’t be considered one of the All Time Greatest.

Post Comment